Ed. Snowden is A Dangle

This is not about theatrical digestion but Edward Snowden himself.

The single logical criteria in evaluating the validity of a whistleblower is the material that he leaks. In 3 years, not a single document that Mr. Snowden leaked has informed us anything about the U.S. government operation which we haven』t already known through other channels.
In the highly compartmentalized world of military intelligence, should Mr. Snowden been rooting around U.S. government indices/files/network drives, there’s not a chance in the world that he would be granted/able to keep priority access to literally everything they had. In fact they would have seen his activities in unauthorized areas and effect an immediate arrest for security breaches during one of Mr. Snowden’s epic downloading episode bound to trip over all levels of alarms in the network system.

Many would think about the name 「茱莉亞n Assange」 when 「Snowden」 is mentioned. Indeed they』ve shared an apparent career path and have had close correspondence, all in the domain of public knowledge. Virtually all of Snowden’s leaks came through Glenn Greenwald who’s tightly affiliated with Assange. Assange’s every aspect of life identifies him as a Rothchild agent. Even his lawyer is the prominent Mark Stephens whose law firm Finers Stephens Innocent is legal adviser to the Rothschild Waddesdon Trust which is concerned with the 「maintenance, improvement and payment of certain of the outgoings in respect of Waddesdon Manor (Rothschild’s most prestigious property in the UK) in the Vale of Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.」

As a whistleblower running against the tide for the public good, the best strategy is to publish with as many agencies as possible the most damning information(at least a high percentage of them) as fast as possible. This puts the most important data permanently in the public domain while reducing the effectiveness of a planned assassination on the whistleblower. Yet we have not seen any critical information on the most life-changing event of the 21 century – 9/11 which has been ridiculously blamed on Osama Bin Laden who was a CIA agent code-named "Tim Ossman". In fact Mr. Snowden himself continued to push the narrative of an inter-governmental-agency communicational malfunction which is proven to be completely false; We have not seen any information concerning the Saudi-Muslim background of Barack Hussein Obama who sealed off his academic record to hide his previous reception of U.S. foreign student scholarships, his operation with the Taliban for the CIA and the subsequent conflict with it; We have not seen any document about the organization and planning of the hoaxes events of Sandy Hook (FEMA Capstone Drill) and Boston Bombing which was planned in 2008 known as the project "Marathon a Tale of Two Cities and the Planning of a Mass Casualty Event"; We have not seen any information regarding "Olympics Games" - The Stuxnet virus and its subsequent products.

The public image of Snowden is no more real than Santa Clause is. People should immediately discern a red-flag when the corporate media(ref. Operation Mockingbird) started a consistent path to glorify this person. Mr. Snowden himself showed a peculiar level of message-discipline well-known in PR training the trait of which is virtually non-existent for any of his previous century predecessors. It is a typical operational strategy of the Central Intelligence Agency to make such kind of disinformation agents look miserable. They were usually portrayed as being wrongfully persecuted/prosecuted, went through lengthy legal proceedings and were in fear of retribution from the U.S. i.e. Extradition. In real life Ed. Snowden would have been boldly killed by U.S. intelligence operatives while still bouncing along the travel map to retrieve the classified information.

So yes. Please remind yourself next time when jerking off to 傑西卡 Chastain in 「Zero Dark Thirty」 that nothing you see is real unless one does his own research and form his own syntactic proofs.